All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Advanced Analysis and Applications (JAAA) are evaluated through a rigorous peer-review process to ensure scientific quality and integrity.
Review Model
JAAA operates under a double-blind peer-review system, in which:
- the identities of the reviewers are concealed from the authors
- the identities of the authors are concealed from the reviewers
This ensures an impartial and unbiased evaluation.
Initial Editorial Screening
Upon submission, manuscripts are first evaluated by the Editors-in-Chief to determine:
- relevance to the journal’s aims and scope
- originality
- clarity of presentation
- adherence to ethical standards
Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected without external review.
Assignment to Reviewers
Manuscripts considered suitable for review are sent to at least two independent experts in the field. Reviewers are selected based on:
- subject expertise
- prior reviewing experience
- absence of conflicts of interest
Review Criteria
Reviewers are asked to evaluate manuscripts according to:
- originality and novelty
- correctness of results
- clarity and rigor of mathematical arguments
- significance of the findings
- relevance to existing literature
- overall contribution to the field
Review Time
Reviewers are typically expected to return their evaluation within 4–8 weeks.
In some cases, additional time may be granted if needed.
Editorial Decisions
Based on the reviewers’ reports, the editorial decision may be:
- Accept
- Minor revision
- Major revision
- Reject
In the case of a revision:
- authors must respond carefully and point-by-point to all reviewer comments
- the revised manuscript may be re-evaluated by the original reviewers or by new reviewers
Confidentiality
All submitted manuscripts and review reports are treated as confidential documents.
Reviewers must not share, cite, or use unpublished material from a manuscript for personal advantage.
Reviewer Conduct
Reviewers are expected to:
- provide constructive and professional feedback
- avoid personal criticism
- declare any conflicts of interest
- review manuscripts objectively and fairly
- decline the review if they do not feel qualified in the topic or cannot meet the deadline
Final Decision
The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection rests with the Editors-in-Chief, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations and the editorial judgment.